Applying the CrossMark icon is a commitment by the Negah Institute for Scientific Communication to maintain the content published and alert readers to changes if and when they occur.
What is CrossMark?
CrossMark, a multi-publisher initiative from CrossRef, provides a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of a document. We recognize the importance of the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record to researchers and librarians and attach the highest importance to maintaining trust in the authority of its electronic archive. Clicking on the CrossMark icon will inform the reader of the current status of a document and also provide additional publication record information about the document.
Permanency of Content
All content published in Negah Institute for Scientific Communication is permanently published, regardless of the outcome of the peer review that follows after publication. All versions of all articles that have passed peer review are permanently archived in PubMed Central.
Negah Institute for Scientific Communication participates in the CrossMark scheme. This multi-publisher initiative has developed a standard way for readers to locate the current version of a piece of content. By applying the CrossMark policies, Negah Institute for Scientific Communication is committed to maintaining the content it publishes and alerting readers to changes if and when they occur.
Clicking on the CrossMark logo at the top of each Negah Institute for Scientific Communication article will give you the current status of the article and its last updates and direct you to the latest published version.
To maintain the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record, we will apply the COPE Policies on Retraction Guidelines when published content needs to be corrected or retracted; these policies consider current best practices in scholarly publishing. Based on the COPE guideline, Negah Journals editors consider retracting a publication if:
- there is clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g., data fabrication) or honest error (e.g., miscalculation or experimental error)
- the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission, or justification (i.e., cases of redundant publication)
- it constitutes plagiarism
- it reports unethical research
Negah Journals editors consider issuing an expression of concern if:
- they receive inconclusive evidence of research or publication misconduct by the authors
- there is evidence that the findings are unreliable, but the authors’ institution will not investigate the case
- they believe that an investigation into alleged misconduct related to the publication either has not been or would not be fair and impartial or conclusive
- an investigation is underway, but a judgment will not be available for a considerable time
Negah Journals editors consider issuing a correction if:
- a small portion of an otherwise reliable publication proves to be misleading (mainly because of honest error)
- the author/contributor list is incorrect (i.e., a deserving author has been omitted, or somebody who does not meet authorship criteria has been included)
Retractions are not usually appropriate if:
- A change of authorship is required, but there is no reason to doubt the validity of the findings